Total Pageviews

Saturday, May 4, 2013

PERTINENT CHANGES SOUGHT IN SACRAMENTO TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT - IT SHOULD AFFECT SAN FRANCISCO ON THE LOCAL LEVEL.

Two major bills that will affect the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) - have been initiated in Sacramento the Capital of California - State Bill 317 and State Bill 731.

Here on the local level - our drab, shallow, spineless San Francisco - Board of Supervisors - the likes of Scott Weiner, Jane Kim, and others are dabbling to make changes to CEQA - more to seek personal gain and attention.

The CEQA bill is a State Bill that assures - all constituents in California the right to have a say - on matters that adversely impact them.  We, Californians must fight tooth and nail - to preserve this right - and deal with those that want to deny us this mandated - State passed right - which is law - CEQA.

Again and again we have seen that the original bill; CEQA - that once used to protect the rights of the tax payers - has been circumvented using many ploys and machinations.

In the old days - our Representatives never, ever imagined that we would have to deal with - "political whores and pimps" in the days we live today - where laws, rules, and regulations - are ignored by very - corrupt politicians the likes of David Chiu, Malia Cohen, Scott Weiner - and Jane Kim.

That is what we have in San Francisco today - political whores and pimps at City Hall - pandering to Developers and circumventing the process. Denying, decent citizens their rights - and adversely impacting thousands.

Those of us who have lived in San Francisco for some time - know - there was a time when - all constituents within a certain radius of a project - would be notified - no more.

When CEQA was first formulated - the many gray areas - were not addressed - and for a very long time - it was NOT visited to address the concerns of unnecessary law suits - and filing of documents - that delay the process.

There are technicalities that Land Use Lawyers - for a fee - can halt any project - as the legislation now stands - with some loop holes.

These loop holes must be closed - and those using fake ploys without justification and facts - less empirical data - must be taken to task. Including jail time plus heavy penalties made part of the adjudication - process.

The paradox is we have had SF Supervisors - play a role - is deceiving rather than representing.

We saw this with Scott Weiner, David Chiu, Malia Cohen, and Eric Mar - linked to the Parkmerced Housing - slated to be demolished. All of them were charged by the San Francisco Ethics Commission - and right so.

All of them did not side with the renters of one of the largest - "rental housing" in San Francisco - at Parkmerced. They chose to side with the devil - the developer - who we are watching - like a hawk. Your time will come - and when you fall down - you will live on your face - for a long, long time - shunned and in disgrace. You and those that sides with your - evil development.
You already failed in Canada - but our foolish SF Board of Supervisor - know nothing about investigative reporting and less about gathering - facts.

If demolished - the Parkmerced Rental Housing  will adversely impact; hundreds of senior citizens.

Seniors and other who have lived in these unites for decades - will be thrown out - evicted - and will have to fend for themselves.

In San Francisco - finding housing is very difficult - especially for those on fixed income.

Again and again we see - and I have witnessed myself - lobbyists - and some well renowned like the "thug Mayor" - Willie L. Brown Jr exercise his corrupt influence - to favor Developers - and bull doze the rights of decent, hard working - constituents - for a large fee.

Two Supervisors in particular who pander to the Developers - while pretending to work for the citizens of San Francisco - Malia Cohen from District 10 and Jane Kim from District 6. One worse than the other.

Then you have Scott Weiner - who can run his mouth - and has the same tendency pandering to the Zionists.

Zionists - who are seeking large land grabs - be it City College, other projects on Treasure Island, Hunters Point, the Transbay and so on and so forth.Scum of the Earth - sordid and despicable.

An important factor to note in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) are projects built on infill. This discussion is now becoming technical and can be addressed - if a universal sound definition is arrived at. A definition that is holistic linked to "infill sites".

For years we environmentalists - who do all the spade work at - "ground zero" - have been hard hit - dealing with the CEQA process.

Again and again - lack of sound and precise - notification. If you are not notified - there is nothing you can do - except - protest - after the fact.

Advocates have also pressed for the element - linked to Cumulative Impacts - and for years.

The State Regulators, Local policy makers and Representatives - have turned a deaf ear.

We want to see - precise language in the tweaking of CEQA - and in the name of fair play - to incorporate - " the impacts of Cumulative Impacts".

At Hunters Point Naval Shipyard for example - the infill is the worst ever. It is a Superfund Site. One the worst sites are listed on the Superfund List.

More contaminated with Radioactive Elements; Hunters Point Naval Shipyard - contaminated by World War II experiments and operations.

The United States wants to hoodwink the public at large - by pretending to tell us - that capping, failing to address the clean up of the water shed.

Depleted Uranium was tested at Hunters Point Naval Shipyard. The National Defense Radiological Laboratory was at Hunters Point - what is now Lawrence Livermore Laboratory dealing with Nuclear elements.

One Atomic Bomb left Hunters Point to be dropped on Japan - killing millions - we know about this - but we fail to ponder about the consequences and KARMA. 

Using jargon and fancy words  in their drab, shallow, inaccurate documentation - the United States Navy - think we will accept their fake proposal and will permit them to hand over the Shipyard - for development.

No one can fool - all the people - all the time.

On Parcel A that was conveyed the Restoration Advisory Board (RAB) consisting of citizens - did not agree on the passing of the Record of Decision (ROD). We must remind the U.S. Navy that we the people - do not trust you for one, single second. Pathetic fools trying to play with fire. Your doom is at hand.

Keith Forman and his minions - have their work cut out for them - and they are doing a very poor job. They must suffer from the consequences of the doings of  - "jettison".

The blood of our children, women and men, seniors is on them - and the U.S. Navy cared less about the Precautionary Principle, even less about CEQA, and their NEPA, Record of Decisions - are heavily - flawed. They are never - ever to be trusted.

The District 10 Supervisor, Malia Cohen who is on the take - has always been on the take - joined politics to pander to people that can give her money - is a disgrace to the human race - and being Black - a shame to the segment of the population - she purports to represent.

Market Prices units are built elsewhere like downtown - and so called low income housing - on Brown Fields - that are contaminated in the Bayview Hunters Point.

The units built by the John Stewart Company - had not taken into consideration - Cumulative Impacts - the air is polluted - the surrounding area within feet of the newly constructed units contaminated.

The mostly Black population - in and around Huntersview NOT educated on issues - hoping against hope - to get some little - relief. Falling for the stale bread crumbs that are thrown to the sell out - like hungry dogs - who have lost their mind.

" No good will ever come at Hunters Point Naval Shipyard"  and that includes - Parcel A.

Lennar the Rogue Company is NOT to be trusted - ever.

Lennar and all those who purport to work for Lennar - have BLOOD on their hands.

On Parcel A and on Hunters Point Naval Shipyard - the constituents have been kept in the dark - by the U. S. Navy NOT providing empirical data - the data is changed to favor - the conceptual plans of the U.S. Navy.

The Environmental Protect Agency and Region IX had failed the constituents of San Francisco. You have not acted and pander to Diane Feinstein, Nancy Pelosi, and Barbara Boxer.

The Navy's Environmental Impact Studies are flawed.

The City and County of San Francisco wants the land to fast track development that is inferior in nature.

When the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was released - it was released during the Christmas Holidays - and this was done to shun he public - and those who fought the EIR - did so at their own peril and expense.

We the people spent $5 thousand to fight Lennar and won -putting proposition F on the Ballot.

Lennar spent $10 million and lost - with Proposition G - and today is reeling the dust of shame and abject corruption. "No good will ever come at Hunters Point Naval Shipyard".

Anyone, that has anything to do with LENNAR has blood on their hands. We can name them as we have done before - but, it would do no good. They are - to say the least - despicable.

The City and County of San Francisco has NOT been mindful of CEQA, the Precautionary Principle, the many EIRs and of course - being truthful to the constituents of San Francisco. Shame on them.

We demand that Cumulative Elements that adversely impact projects - be taken, seriously - into account. We demand standards - and mandate strict regulations when it comes of infill.

If anyone lives at Hunters Point Naval Shipyard they will have to sign a waiver. The waiver says they cannot plant anything in their back yard. If they do it will in planters - having clean, fresh dirt - brought from a clean source.

The waiver will warn anyone from going to the near by Bay - they will be barriers and signs that read - stay back and off the area.

Now, tell me who wants to live in such conditions - who wants to live in the middle of - Chernobyl? Aho.

One can submit their written comments - to contribute in a meaningful way - and help the Legislators bring about solutions and better define the California Environmental Quality Act:

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB731